Navigation
Firefox vs. Opera
Fr 10.11.2006, 22:42

All browsers (even IE) can render webpages – ok some of them better (safari) and some of them worse (IE… some pages look better on IE because they are optimized for the marktführer, but that is another topic).
Firefox and Opera have their advanteges and peculieraties, I will try to compare them, in order to make it easier to decide which one to use in future.

feature Firefox 1.5 Opera 8.5
copy & paste (best would be full RTF, IE supports this) ++ plain text, partly tables & graphics 00 plain text
drag & drop ++ no address out, links out, graphics out, others out (e.g. videos to player), links in 00 no address out, no links out, no graphics out, no others out, links in
mouse gestures ++ ++
sessions 00 with plugin (buggy, not 100% crash-proof), snap back tabs/windows ++ very nice, never had any probs, snap back tabs/?windows?
password manager ++ ++
download manager ++ no resume, nor with plugins (promised, but does not work) ++ good, with resume
ads ++ good popup- and adblocker, partly layer ads (plugin)
image saving ++ save to specific folder with right click (plugin) ++ save all images from a page
skinning completely skinnable, helpful DOM inspector ++ well and easily skinnable
(felt) stability 1/A 1+/A+
(felt) application speed ++
vertical tabs ++ ++
use IE rendering engine yes, with plugin IETab yes, but difficult
unsopported pages – some of our intranet pages – Google Docs, Yahoo! Mail Beta
ftp – viewing, manager with plugin (FireFTP), crude – only viewing
search with address-bar ++ with keychar and withou 00 only with keychar (sucks a bit)
search in page ++ on typing after pressing “.” (sucks a bit)
email 00 no 00 yes, but buggy and uncomfortable, no rules
GreaseMonkey ++
web development ++ DOM inspector, FireBug (JS debuggin) 00 nothing
fit to width (avoid horizontal scrolling) 00 ++
result 13 – 4 = 9 12 – 4 = 8
Footnotes
DreamFlasher / Marcel Ackermann is proudly powered by WordPress All entries (RSS feed) All comments (RSS feed) Page hits: 1